Close Menu

    Subscribe to Updates

    Get the latest creative news from FooBar about art, design and business.

    What's Hot

    LSEG’s Lipper reviews transaction affecting fixed-income fund flow data

    July 25, 2026

    DeepSeek tells prospective investors of funding pause, Bloomberg News reports

    July 25, 2026

    AI firms want more data centers; Trump’s EPA may give neighbors less say

    July 25, 2026
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    Addison Markets
    • Home
    • USA
    • Europe
    • Business
    • Investing
    • Tech
    • Politics
    • Contact Us
    Addison Markets
    Home»Europe»From Hormuz to Malacca: The toll risk hanging over oil markets
    Europe

    From Hormuz to Malacca: The toll risk hanging over oil markets

    franperez66q@protonmail.comBy franperez66q@protonmail.comJuly 7, 2026No Comments5 Mins Read
    Facebook Twitter Pinterest Telegram LinkedIn Tumblr WhatsApp Email
    Share
    Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Telegram Email


    A view of Belawan Port in the waters of the Malacca Strait, Medan, North Sumatra, Indonesia on April 28, 2026.

    Anadolu | Anadolu | Getty Images

    Iran’s push for control over the Strait of Hormuz has prompted some energy market participants to worry about the introduction of tolls on the Strait of Malacca, one of the world’s most important energy and trade choke points.

    It follows reports that Iran and Oman, which sit on opposite sides of the Strait of Hormuz, have presented the U.S. with a proposal to jointly administer the narrow maritime corridor, including the collection of administrative fees.

    The U.S. and Iran agreed in a memorandum of understanding last month that ships could safely and freely navigate the waterway for 60 days. The Strait of Hormuz typically handles around 20% of the world’s oil traffic.

    Thereafter, the future administration and maritime services of the strait will be defined by Iran and Oman after talks with other Persian Gulf states, “in line with the applicable international law and the sovereign rights of coastal states of the Strait of Hormuz.”

    The notion of some sort of service plan to transit the Strait of Hormuz has sparked alarm across the globe, not least by investors who fear it could be replicated in other strategically vital maritime corridors.

    Maritime experts, however, have said they remain deeply skeptical about the prospect of fees being introduced in the Strait of Malacca.

    Janiv Shah, vice president of commodity markets at Rystad Energy, said some investors were starting to get “a little bit jittery” about the prospect of an oil shock in the form of tolls in the Strait of Malacca.

    “I think part of the reason here is, if we see a potential toll booth with Iran, sort of, enacting upon the Strait of Hormuz, that something similar could be enacted on others, and of course, the most important from a volume metric perspective is … the Strait of Malacca,” Shah told CNBC’s “Squawk Box Europe” on Monday.

    “The way that it will be enacted, of course, I’m unfortunately unable to share a little bit more on that, but it probably will take a lot of time because it is, from a volume metric perspective, significant,” he added.

    The Strait of Malacca, which is the primary choke point in Asia and Oceania, accounted for 29% of total maritime oil flows in the first half of 2025, according to the U.S. Energy Information Administration.

    Crude oil is estimated to make up just over 70% of total oil flows through the waterway each year, with petroleum products accounting for the remainder.

    Spanning about 900 kilometers, the waterway provides the shortest sea route from East Asia to the Middle East and Europe. It is bounded by Indonesia, Thailand, Malaysia and Singapore.

    Strait of Malacca: A choke point, not a flashpoint

    In April, Indonesia’s Finance Minister Purbaya Yudhi Sadewa suggested the country could introduce tolls on ships using the Strait of Malacca, before walking back the idea. Indonesia’s coastline forms the entire southern edge of the Strait of Malacca.

    The establishment of a tolling system would be illegal under international law, which guarantees free passage through straits used for international navigation.

    Indonesia President Prabowo Subianto and Singapore Prime Minister Lawrence Wong both reaffirmed their commitment to the unimpeded passage of vessels through the strait shortly after a meeting in Indonesia’s capital on Monday.

    Hunter Marston, director of the Southeast Asia program at the Sydney-based Lowy Institute, said in a note published June 23 that while the Malacca Strait “easily” meets the definition of a choke point, it is not a flashpoint.

    “Institutions matter,” Marston said, pointing out that the Malacca Straits Patrol (MSP) ensures the waterway remains open to global trade. The MSP is jointly managed by four states: Indonesia, Malaysia, Singapore and Thailand.

    “The arrangement benefits all parties as well as the global economy. Without this institution, the Malacca Strait would be just as vulnerable to capricious closure as the Strait of Hormuz,” he added.

    Rerouting options

    Analysts at the Center for Strategic International Studies (CSIS), a Washington-based think tank, said Iran’s actions regarding the Strait of Hormuz had showcased that controlling a maritime choke point could “significantly augment” a country’s power and deterrence.

    The stakes are “even higher” in the South China Sea, analysts at CSIS said, particularly given the existence of two strategically important waterways that connect many of the world’s major economic centers: namely, the Strait of Malacca and the Taiwan Strait.

    Commercial vessels remain anchored off Port Sultan Qaboos around Qaboos Port on June 21, 2026 in Muscat, Oman.

    Elke Scholiers | Getty Images News | Getty Images

    “Iran’s efforts to control and toll traffic through the Strait of Hormuz have renewed fears that states could try to do the same to the Malacca Strait. China’s threats to use force against Taiwan have also put the Taiwan Strait at the epicenter of one of the world’s most high-stakes geopolitical hotspots,” analysts at CSIS said in an analysis published July 1.

    “If either of these two major straits is interrupted, rerouting options exist, but they will come at a cost,” they added.

    Choose CNBC as your preferred source on Google and never miss a moment from the most trusted name in business news.



    Source link

    Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email
    franperez66q@protonmail.com
    • Website

    Related Posts

    Number 10 North is no ‘gimmick’, says Andy Burnham

    July 24, 2026

    Police seize sophisticated bomb near Northern Irish border

    July 24, 2026

    Europe wins and Brazil loses in Trump tariff overhaul

    July 24, 2026

    The Nestlé supertanker’s turnaround is in train — under the surface

    July 23, 2026

    Ford hopes Spain tie-up with China’s Geely will revive European business

    July 23, 2026

    Traders see September rate hike as ECB mulls energy price spike

    July 23, 2026
    Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

    Top Reviews
    Editors Picks

    LSEG’s Lipper reviews transaction affecting fixed-income fund flow data

    July 25, 2026

    DeepSeek tells prospective investors of funding pause, Bloomberg News reports

    July 25, 2026

    AI firms want more data centers; Trump’s EPA may give neighbors less say

    July 25, 2026

    Big Tech accused of stonewalling European social media researchers

    July 25, 2026
    © 2026 All right reserved
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms & Conditions

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.