Close Menu

    Subscribe to Updates

    Get the latest creative news from FooBar about art, design and business.

    What's Hot

    Ships in Persian Gulf quietly coordinate with U.S. Navy to exit Hormuz

    June 4, 2026

    Nasdaq turns green, S&P and Dow rise on health care boost and falling oil prices By Investing.com

    June 4, 2026

    It doesn’t feel very agricultural: The 2026 Subaru Solterra review

    June 4, 2026
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    Addison Markets
    • Home
    • USA
    • Europe
    • Business
    • Investing
    • Tech
    • Politics
    • Contact Us
    Addison Markets
    Home»Business»Bill Cassidy signs brief calling ‘weaponization’ fund a ‘dire threat’
    Business

    Bill Cassidy signs brief calling ‘weaponization’ fund a ‘dire threat’

    franperez66q@protonmail.comBy franperez66q@protonmail.comJune 4, 2026No Comments3 Mins Read
    Facebook Twitter Pinterest Telegram LinkedIn Tumblr WhatsApp Email
    Share
    Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Telegram Email


    Senator Bill Cassidy (R-LA) speaks during the CNBC CEO Council Summit in Washington D.C. on June 2, 2026.

    Aaron Clamage | CNBC

    Louisiana Republican Sen. Bill Cassidy signed onto an amicus brief calling President Donald Trump’s “weaponization” fund a “dire threat” to Congress and the constitutional order.

    The amicus brief from Cassidy and Sen. Cory Booker, D-N.J., was filed Wednesday in a case challenging the fund that’s working its way through court in Virginia. Cassidy last month lost out of a runoff in Louisiana amid a Trump-backed primary challenge, and Congress is weighing amendments to a budget reconciliation bill that could ax the “lawfare” fund entirely.

    Cassidy’s inclusion on the brief is a window into the broad opposition to the fund from Senate Republicans, who rarely buck Trump due to potential political consequences. It also underscores how Cassidy, who has no more elections to run, could complicate future votes in the Senate.

    The brief argues that the court, which halted the fund temporarily in May, should uphold its block. The senators argued that the fund represents the “immediate and dire threat to our constitutional order and the authority of Congress.”

    “The existence of the Fund strikes at the core of Congressional authority and our Constitutional order,” the senators said.

    Read more CNBC politics coverage

    The lawmakers say the fund violates the “Spending, Appropriations, and Appointments,” while stepping on Congress’s authority over the federal purse. They argue it could also financially compensate convicted violent rioters who stormed the Capitol on Jan. 6, 2021, trying to disrupt the certification of former President Joe Biden’s electoral victory.

    “To deliberately deploy public funds, in violation of the Constitution and the laws of this nation, to compensate these perpetrators is to use the machinery of democratic government to subsidize an attack on that government’s most fundamental processes,” the brief reads.

    The fund originated as part of a settlement of Trump’s $10 billion lawsuit against the Internal Revenue Service for the leak of his tax returns. In exchange for dropping that case, the Justice Department set up a $1.8 billion legal relief fund to compensate victims of what the administration calls “lawfare.”

    Acting Attorney General Todd Blanche testified Tuesday before Congress that the Justice Department has permanently abandoned the weaponization fund and would not pursue it regardless of the outcome in court. Trump and his family, however, maintain protected from audit and other tax enforcement actions in connection with tax returns filed before last month’s out-of-court settlement of his lawsuit, as per the original settlement that created the fund.

    And Trump, speaking with reporters Wednesday in the Oval Office, said he didn’t know if it’s “dead” or “on hold,” saying he’d have to “ask the lawyers.”

    Critics have argued DOJ’s initial statement saying it would not proceed with the fund did not make clear whether the department had dropped any plans for the fund, and are eyeing a more permanent solution.

    “The Court should maintain an injunction against the implementation of the Anti-Weaponization Fund and ultimately render judgment for the Plaintiffs in this matter,” the senators said in the brief.

    Choose CNBC as your preferred source on Google and never miss a moment from the most trusted name in business news.



    Source link

    Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email
    franperez66q@protonmail.com
    • Website

    Related Posts

    Ships in Persian Gulf quietly coordinate with U.S. Navy to exit Hormuz

    June 4, 2026

    Long-term unemployment is surging in the U.S., costing workers and the economy

    June 4, 2026

    World Cup 2026: Health officials focused on Ebola, measles

    June 4, 2026

    Supreme Court sides with FCC in clash with wireless carriers

    June 4, 2026

    Soaring stocks created 2 million new millionaires last year

    June 4, 2026

    Blackstone restricts flagship fund withdrawals

    June 4, 2026
    Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

    Top Reviews
    Editors Picks

    Ships in Persian Gulf quietly coordinate with U.S. Navy to exit Hormuz

    June 4, 2026

    Nasdaq turns green, S&P and Dow rise on health care boost and falling oil prices By Investing.com

    June 4, 2026

    It doesn’t feel very agricultural: The 2026 Subaru Solterra review

    June 4, 2026

    Henry Nowak deserves legacy that goes beyond tragedy, says PM

    June 4, 2026
    © 2026 All right reserved
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms & Conditions

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.