Close Menu

    Subscribe to Updates

    Get the latest creative news from FooBar about art, design and business.

    What's Hot

    No new stock highs, no problem: Options traders bet they’re coming in these names

    September 22, 2026

    Trump-Zelenskyy meeting: U.S. says Russia lost control of diesel oil

    September 22, 2026

    Putin’s ‘war heroes’ form new political elite in Russian parliament

    September 22, 2026
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    Addison Markets Addison Markets
    • Home
    • USA
    • Europe
    • Business
    • Investing
    • Tech
    • Politics
    • Contact Us
    Addison Markets Addison Markets
    Home»Tech»We still don’t have a more precise value for “Big G”
    Tech

    We still don’t have a more precise value for “Big G”

    franperez66q@protonmail.comBy franperez66q@protonmail.comApril 24, 2026No Comments2 Mins Read
    Facebook Twitter Pinterest Telegram LinkedIn Tumblr WhatsApp Email
    Share
    Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Telegram Email



    The gravitational constant, affectionally known as “Big G,” is one of the most fundamental constants of our universe. Its value describes the strength of the gravitational force acting on two masses separated by a given distance—or if you want to be relativistic about it, the amount a given mass curves space-time. Physicists have a solid ballpark figure for the value of Big G, but they’ve been trying to measure it ever more precisely for more than two centuries, each effort yielding slightly different values. And we do mean slight: The values vary by roughly one part in 10,000.

    Still, other fundamental constants are known much more precisely. So Big G is the black sheep of the family and a point of frustration for physicists keen on precision metrology. The problem is that gravity is so weak, by far the weakest of the four fundamental forces, so there is significant background noise from the gravitational field of the Earth (aka “little g”). That weakness is even more pronounced in a laboratory.

    In the latest effort to resolve the issue, scientists at the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) spent the last decade replicating one of the most divergent recent experimental results. The group just announced their results in a paper published in the journal Metrologia. It does not resolve the discrepancy, but it gives physicists one more data point in their ongoing quest to nail down a more precise value for Big G.

    Isaac Newton introduced the concept of a gravitational constant when he published his law of universal gravitation in the late 17th century, although it didn’t get its Big G notation until the 1890s. Newton thought it might be possible to measure the strength of gravity by swinging a pendulum near a large hill and measuring the deflection, but he never attempted the experiment, reasoning that the effect would be too small to measure. By 1774, the Royal Society had established a committee to determine the density of the Earth as an indirect measurement of Big G, using a variation of Newton’s pendulum concept.



    Source link

    Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email
    franperez66q@protonmail.com
    • Website

    Related Posts

    Ukrainian drones overwhelm Russian tanks’ new active protection system—for now

    August 19, 2026

    Jim Cramer says the market is too negative — and that’s creating buying opportunities

    August 19, 2026

    “Sabotage”: Experts, lawmakers blast RFK Jr. for destroying healthcare research

    August 18, 2026

    OpenAI rolls out ChatGPT for Teens with more safety protections

    August 18, 2026

    Against all odds, SpaceX finally tugs Starship into port after 24 days at sea

    August 18, 2026

    Economists warn AI-driven market rally is due a sharp correction

    August 18, 2026
    Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

    Top Reviews
    Editors Picks

    No new stock highs, no problem: Options traders bet they’re coming in these names

    September 22, 2026

    Trump-Zelenskyy meeting: U.S. says Russia lost control of diesel oil

    September 22, 2026

    Putin’s ‘war heroes’ form new political elite in Russian parliament

    September 22, 2026

    Novo CEO signals M&A opportunities to strengthen drug pipeline

    September 22, 2026
    © 2026 All right reserved
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms & Conditions

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.