Close Menu

    Subscribe to Updates

    Get the latest creative news from FooBar about art, design and business.

    What's Hot

    BP leadership exits reignite questions over board structure, oversight

    June 10, 2026

    SoftBank sinks as Asia tech stocks tumble, tracking Wall Street tech losses

    June 10, 2026

    Taiwan stocks lower at close of trade; Taiwan Weighted down 3.48%

    June 10, 2026
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    Addison Markets
    • Home
    • USA
    • Europe
    • Business
    • Investing
    • Tech
    • Politics
    • Contact Us
    Addison Markets
    Home»Tech»We still don’t have a more precise value for “Big G”
    Tech

    We still don’t have a more precise value for “Big G”

    franperez66q@protonmail.comBy franperez66q@protonmail.comApril 24, 2026No Comments2 Mins Read
    Facebook Twitter Pinterest Telegram LinkedIn Tumblr WhatsApp Email
    Share
    Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Telegram Email



    The gravitational constant, affectionally known as “Big G,” is one of the most fundamental constants of our universe. Its value describes the strength of the gravitational force acting on two masses separated by a given distance—or if you want to be relativistic about it, the amount a given mass curves space-time. Physicists have a solid ballpark figure for the value of Big G, but they’ve been trying to measure it ever more precisely for more than two centuries, each effort yielding slightly different values. And we do mean slight: The values vary by roughly one part in 10,000.

    Still, other fundamental constants are known much more precisely. So Big G is the black sheep of the family and a point of frustration for physicists keen on precision metrology. The problem is that gravity is so weak, by far the weakest of the four fundamental forces, so there is significant background noise from the gravitational field of the Earth (aka “little g”). That weakness is even more pronounced in a laboratory.

    In the latest effort to resolve the issue, scientists at the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) spent the last decade replicating one of the most divergent recent experimental results. The group just announced their results in a paper published in the journal Metrologia. It does not resolve the discrepancy, but it gives physicists one more data point in their ongoing quest to nail down a more precise value for Big G.

    Isaac Newton introduced the concept of a gravitational constant when he published his law of universal gravitation in the late 17th century, although it didn’t get its Big G notation until the 1890s. Newton thought it might be possible to measure the strength of gravity by swinging a pendulum near a large hill and measuring the deflection, but he never attempted the experiment, reasoning that the effect would be too small to measure. By 1774, the Royal Society had established a committee to determine the density of the Earth as an indirect measurement of Big G, using a variation of Newton’s pendulum concept.



    Source link

    Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email
    franperez66q@protonmail.com
    • Website

    Related Posts

    Beyond ‘Silicon Roundabout’: The next challenge for UK tech

    June 10, 2026

    Three key vital signs make up the “urban pulse” of a city

    June 10, 2026

    Stocks recover from sell-off, but even bulls warn of more volatility

    June 10, 2026

    Locked in heated rivalry with researcher, Microsoft fixes 0-day they disclosed

    June 10, 2026

    How Jim Cramer views Apple on Day 2 of its post-WWDC keynote pullback

    June 10, 2026

    Starlink charges $10 monthly hardware fee in move away from one-time purchases

    June 10, 2026
    Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

    Top Reviews
    Editors Picks

    BP leadership exits reignite questions over board structure, oversight

    June 10, 2026

    SoftBank sinks as Asia tech stocks tumble, tracking Wall Street tech losses

    June 10, 2026

    Taiwan stocks lower at close of trade; Taiwan Weighted down 3.48%

    June 10, 2026

    Beyond ‘Silicon Roundabout’: The next challenge for UK tech

    June 10, 2026
    © 2026 All right reserved
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms & Conditions

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.